24 pages • 48 minutes read
Peter SingerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Singer’s essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” is in the standard form of an argument. His writing is direct and objective, attempting to persuade readers primarily through logic, with a minimum of emotional appeal and figurative language. Singer does, however, permit himself a few subtle points intended to prod the reader or grab attention. This even-handed tone is juxtaposed with the radicalism of his ideas. Though the essay was first published in an academic journal, which by definition has a limited readership, his audience is essentially everyone in developed countries—that is, citizens of affluent nations.
Without introduction, Singer states the problem he’s addressing: People and governments have the power and means to stop the suffering of millions of people in Bangladesh and have simply decided not to. This grabs the reader’s attention by prompting the question, “How can that be?” and the desire to read on and learn more.
From there, he walks through his argument in straightforward fashion. He starts with an assumption that axiomatic (suffering is bad), creating from it a principle: We should act to prevent suffering if doing so does not involve a morally significant sacrifice.
By Peter Singer
Animal Liberation
Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals
Peter Singer
The Life You Can Save
The Life You Can Save: How To Do Your Part To End World Poverty
Peter Singer
The Singer Solution to World Poverty
The Singer Solution to World Poverty
Peter Singer
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection
View Collection