54 pages 1 hour read

Lauren Fleshman

Good for a Girl: A Woman Running in a Man's World

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 15-16

Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 15 Summary: “Bird Machine”

Sally, the owner of Oiselle, invited Fleshman to see their business headquarters in Seattle. Fleshman felt drawn to the space for its small size (reminding her of her own business in its infancy) and to the all-female staff and focus. She went for a run with Sally, who understood her frustrations with Nike.

Fleshman discussed her concerns over the latest young female phenomenon, Mary Cain, training with Alberto Salazar, with Oiselle investors.

Fleshman, now three months pregnant, signed on with Oiselle; she was the first athlete to sign an endorsement deal while openly pregnant. Although the starting salary they offered was small, they also made Fleshman a partner in the business and offered her stock.

Fleshman modeled Oiselle workout clothes on the runway at New York Fashion Week a few months after the birth of her son, Jude. Realizing that she was contributing to the pressure on women to return to pre-baby weight, she was quick to publish other, less flattering photos of herself, which trended with the hashtag #KeepingItReal.

Fleshman began writing a column for Runner’s World. For her cover photo, she objected to their creative guidelines specifying that women must wear form-fitting spandex shorts, insisting on wearing her looser-fitting ones.

Oiselle circulated Fleshman’s “Letter to My Younger Self,” and Fleshman was celebrated for her advocacy on social media.

Fleshman repaired a rift with Kara Goucher, a rival who didn’t sacrifice her spot in the 5,000-meter race for Fleshman in the 2008 Olympic selection. Goucher joined Oiselle.

Fleshman reflects that, while Oiselle has done its best to be inclusive, there have been blind spots in their marketing that have been exclusionary. Dena Evans, Fleshman’s old coach (and a woman of color) pointed out that their advertising was done with exclusively white models; Fleshman realized that her feminism needed to become more intersectional.

Despite the challenges of the path of advocacy that Oiselle champions, Fleshman feels proud to be doing work that is aligned with who she is.

Chapter 16 Summary: “Beyond the Lanes”

Fleshman then began her career as a coach by founding a group called Littlewing. Her first athlete was Mel Lawrence, who had had a successful high school and early college career, only to have struggled with injuries over the last four years. Fleshman’s approach focuses on providing support on various aspects of athletes’ health, including their injury recovery, diet, and mental health. Lawrence became competitive in the field again, finishing third in a USA championship and within the top 20 in the world.

Fleshman attended a woman’s retreat called Muse Camp, where she reflected on how widespread body image issues are among women.

While at a track meet, Fleshman worried again about young athlete Mary Cain, who underperformed and was spoken to rudely by her coach, Alberto Salazar. She now regrets not speaking to Cain at the event; she feels that Cain could have thrived under her gentler, more supportive mentorship at Littlewing. Instead, Cain suffered immensely at the hands of Salazar and later went on to file a lawsuit against Nike for abuse.

Fleshman retired as a professional athlete in 2016. She continues to focus on her coaching; it brings her immense joy and satisfaction to create a safe space for female athletes to thrive in.

Frank, suffering from cancer, was put into an induced coma. He died soon after. The morning after his death, Fleshman saw a more youthful version of him standing in her bedroom. She went for a run, reflecting on his life and death, including his addiction to alcohol, and broke down crying at the track of her old high school, realizing that so much of her running career had been driven by trying to impress him and connect with him.

Chapters 15-16 Analysis

Male Physiology and Sexism Shaping Norms in Women’s Sports continues to be explored in these final chapters. Unlike with Oiselle, Fleshman had to fight at Nike to convince them that female athletes are marketable: “The most common concern expressed by the men in the room was whether female customers would be turned off by our competitive backgrounds” (178). The male executives at Nike believed that while men found competitive athleticism admirable and inspiring (and would be motivated to buy sportswear worn by competitive athletes), it would turn women off, who would presumably prefer to aspire to achieve the figures of the models Nike previously exclusively featured in sports catalogs aimed at women. Nike’s blatant sexism is contrasted with Oiselle, who had Fleshman model their clothing at New York Fashion Week, conveying their confidence in Fleshman’s competitive athleticism as an attractive marketing strategy in selling sportswear to women.

Furthermore, unlike with Nike, the feminism that underpins Oiselle’s practice is illustrated when Fleshman explains how she signed with them while pregnant and modeled for them only a few months after giving birth (at a point where she still would have been on an unpaid injury suspension with Nike): “I believe it was the first time a female professional athlete had inked a significant endorsement deal while openly pregnant. It felt like progress” (182). Fleshman positions readers to condemn Nike’s dated and sexist position around female advertising and athlete sponsorship and to admire Oiselle’s, which celebrates female athleticism without needing to sexualize female athletes and which conceives of pregnancy as a normal part of female life that shouldn’t affect the conditions of employment or pay.

Fleshman has shaped her life around being the figure in women’s sports that she and so many of her teammates needed in earlier stages of their lives and careers. Being a sponsored athlete with Oiselle is part of this decision to align herself with her beliefs and with a feeling of personal integrity: “My racing life and my work life were finally in alignment when I partnered with Oiselle” (187). Like Oiselle, Fleshman symbolizes positive progress in the industry. Women who train with Fleshman, like Lawrence, are able to rediscover Empowerment and Joy From Running, as is illustrated in Lawrence’s strong results on the US and world stage. Furthermore, Fleshman’s practice embodies her belief in the importance of maintaining a life-long relationship with running beyond an athlete’s professional life by maintaining athletes’ positive relationships to their bodies and their minds as they compete: “[W]hen it was time to move on from racing, they would be more likely to thrive and still love the sport” (189).

Fleshman’s approach, which acknowledges and works with the female body, including accepting and normalizing performance dips, is contrasted with the manner in which Mary Cain was mentored by Alberto Salazar when she underperformed: “He lit into her for her poor performance, blaming her weight” (193). Salazar’s methods sought to recriminate and blame Cain, rather than understanding the biological reasons behind her weight gain and slower times. Cain’s journey—engaging in self-harm and later suing for abuse—illustrates the failure of believing that women’s athletic performance can be simplified to a model of punitive and taxing training equating to faster times. Her journey can be contrasted with Fleshman’s athletes at Littlewing, who thrive under a female-centric model of athlete development.