Parker claims that her theories about gatherings apply to everything from birthday parties to conversations on race. However, she does distinguish a gathering from a “simple, casual hangout” that does not have a stated purpose (25). Do you agree with this distinction? Or do you think it is possible for hangouts to be purposeful, or that some gatherings don’t have to have a purpose?

The structure of The Art of Gathering reflects its goal of providing readers with an overview of conceptualizing, hosting, and ending a gathering. In addition, Parker often provides anecdotes describing how she has personally enacted her ideas. What do you think is the significance of this hands-on, practical approach?

The anecdotal evidence Parker utilizes throughout the book encompasses stories of successful ideas and techniques as well as failures—including her own. Why do you think that Parker included stories of failure, and how do they support the book’s goals overall?